Results 1 to 10 of 44

Thread: DB's binding jig

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #23
    Moderator dingobass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,491
    To point out the problem of wobbly and inaccurate binding channels cut by having the router rest on the top, I have taken a few pics to make it easy to see where I am coming from.

    I have used a LP body for this example.

    First pic shows the channel correctly cut as denoted by the blue tape.
    You will see that the bottom edge of the binding is parallel to the back edge.

    Black penline shows approx where the bottom of the binding would run if the router ran over the top.
    As you can see, it is out by a country mile and would look very ordinary indeed..

    Next up is a pic of a true arch top Guitar. As you can see the arch is present on front and back.
    The only secure way to mount this type of body is with adjustable clamps.

    The same would apply to an Acoustic Guitar, as the back is not flat on these either.

    This is why you wont see a floating type of binding jig in too many Professional Luthiers workshops.
    I have spoken to some of my collegues, and they all agree with me on this one.
    Binding router jigs should be height lockable and not run on the body for very good reasons.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpeg 
Views:	229 
Size:	501.7 KB 
ID:	9360   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpeg 
Views:	223 
Size:	34.2 KB 
ID:	9361   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpeg 
Views:	218 
Size:	350.7 KB 
ID:	9362  

    There is always a workaround for glitches, mistakes and other Guitar building gremlins.....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •