Is the tele neck flame maple?
Glad the neck carving worked out OK.
For my headstocks I use a jigsaw, then the router method.
Is the tele neck flame maple?
Glad the neck carving worked out OK.
For my headstocks I use a jigsaw, then the router method.
PitBull Builds: FVB-4, LP-1SS, FBM-1, AG-2, TB-4, SSCM-1, TLA-1,TL-1TB, STA-1HT, DSCM-1 Truckster, ST-1, STA-1, MBM-1, MBM custom, GHR-1 (Resonator), FH-5V (Acoustic), DMS-1 (Mustang).
Scratch Builds: Pine Explorer, Axe Bass, Mr Scary, Scratchy Tele's.
The little voices in my head keep telling me "build more guitars"
Thanks, TD. I am relieved ;-) I was reluctant to try to "free hand" sand along a traced line. I had seen Simon use this approach, but was quite content using the router method which I thought to be more precise and faster. (which it usually is). I actually used an old router template to trace the outline on the bass neck. The router approach has the great advantages of being quick and replicable. It was my go-to approach up to this build. But I had couple of bad experiences with maple, where the bit caught and split the wood along the grain. Once on a headstock. That one shot a piece at me like a projectile. So, I thought I'd give Simon's method a try.
Like most problems in routing the issue is probably a faulty operator. My bits were good quality and sharp...but also straight. I have read that spiral bits may catch less. There are at least a half dozen other errors I might have made.