Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Lyn #18 - P-Bass

  1. #11
    Moderator Brendan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    3,444
    Quote Originally Posted by emuflats View Post
    Cheers Brendan
    Just tried to open & it says "invalid post" contact Admin..
    Not sure why - navigation via menus is below. There's also a dodgy vid here starring your truly: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yA4c4rTseY&t=144s
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Fret dots how to.jpg 
Views:	96 
Size:	223.5 KB 
ID:	31256  

  2. #12
    Mentor robin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,513
    For some reason I’m finding it a bit hard to maintain my momentum with this build but I have finally progressed a little so I thought it was about time for another update.


    Now where was I……


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2157_small.jpg 
Views:	121 
Size:	963.9 KB 
ID:	32295
    Neck is finished...... so onto the body.


    I find that the belly cuts on these kits usually need a bit more work so its out with a pencil and my favourite toy, the Japanese Saw Rasp.


    Its a process of pencil marking the shape and removing what shouldn’t be there.


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2120.jpg 
Views:	117 
Size:	605.4 KB 
ID:	32296
    First, roughly pencil the shape and then….


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2121.jpg 
Views:	105 
Size:	596.8 KB 
ID:	32297
    Start removing unwanted wood. The File Rasp is a fantastic tool for hand shaping timber and it removes the wood fairly quickly but does not leave too many “chew” mark that you later have to sand out.


    I wanted to keep the striking grain, so I thought I would try and enhance it with some dark grain-filling. But I didn’t want to remove the grain texture, so I mixed up a slurry of Walnut TimberMate and water to the consistency of runny custard and applied it all over. Not sure it was the right idea, but I wanted to give it a try.


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2122.jpg 
Views:	110 
Size:	703.1 KB 
ID:	32298
    When finished shaping, I applied the TimberMate slurry, let it dry.


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2123.jpg 
Views:	115 
Size:	608.2 KB 
ID:	32299
    Then sanded it off.

  3. #13
    Mentor robin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,513
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2154.JPG 
Views:	114 
Size:	442.7 KB 
ID:	32300
    The back of the guitar showing the belly cut. Plus, as most of my practice is done sitting down I also do (what I call) a “lap” cut. It’s a comfort thing. Lol.


    Now the fun part, applying the Tru-Oil finish. AFTER applying a “soak” coat I apply multiple very thin coats of T-O. I find that applying the T-O in sections is the easiest way to go.


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2156.JPG 
Views:	121 
Size:	549.9 KB 
ID:	32301
    You can see 8 drops of T-O and this is more than enough to do half of the top of the guitar. By the time I have wiped this over the bottom half I can feel the application cloth start to drag as the T-O is spread out and starts to dry. Follow this procedure for the rest of the guitar and then you can hang it up for a few hours to dry. Do this about another 20 times and you will end up with a nice thin layer of T-O on your guitar.


    Here in Brisbane I can apply 4 coats a day so, weather permitting, I can usually apply all the T-O in about a week.


    I will now hang it under the house for another week until the T-O stops “gassing off” and then I will try and get a gloss finish.

  4. Liked by: dave.king1

  5. #14
    Mentor robin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,513
    Hey Guys, sorry for the lengthy absence but I'm back now with a few updates.

    I actually finished the bass a few months ago and have used it a couple of times at church so I thought I had better put this thread to bed with an update.

    Front
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2195_700.jpg 
Views:	114 
Size:	133.6 KB 
ID:	38041

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2201_700.jpg 
Views:	108 
Size:	147.4 KB 
ID:	38042

    Back
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2193_700.jpg 
Views:	112 
Size:	151.6 KB 
ID:	38043

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2194_700.jpg 
Views:	106 
Size:	139.7 KB 
ID:	38044

    Headstock
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2196_700.jpg 
Views:	109 
Size:	103.6 KB 
ID:	38045

    All in all I am quite happy with the end result, but I need to revisit the electrics. The cheap pots are little more than on/off switches. All the control is within the first quarter turn of both pots. I have also noticed that compared to another bass used at church (a real Fender P) it lacks a wee bit of volume. I was a bit surprised as I updated the pups with ToneRiders which, in the past, have been excellent products and every bit as good as original Fender fare. I am hoping that better pots will address this problem.

    I might also upgrade the hardware at some stage and get rid of the cheap and nasty bridge and replace it with a better quality string through. This might also help address the volume issue.

    But even as she is, I'm very happy with her and she has earned a place in my bass arsenal.

    Cheers guys
    rob

  6. Liked by: Cliff Rogers

  7. #15
    Mentor DarkMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    1,531
    Beautiful! Did you give the maple fretboard a coat of tru oil?

  8. #16
    GAStronomist Simon Barden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    10,547
    Looks fantastic as always.

    It's doubtful that better pots will improve the volume, though you may have a high resistance solder joint which is taking the edge off the output. The pots I fitted to my ES-3 kit suffer from all the action being in the 8-10 range, and these are Bare Knuckles custom CTS 550k vintage taper pots! Back to standard CTS 450 series audio taper pots for me.

    Are the strings the same type as on the P-bass? A thicker string will give slightly more output, and some string materials give more output than others. Though your pickup height looks to be fine from the photo, if the P-bass pickups are nearer the strings, then again that will give that bit more volume. And the pickups themselves may have different outputs with different numbers of winds. 50's style PB pickups were wound a bit hotter than 60s style PB pickups. The DCR of the TR pickup at 10.6k is on a par with Bare Knuckle's 1965 style pickup, which is about 1k less than the BK 1958 style pickup. I'd be more concerned about tone than about a slight volume difference, as you can always turn the amp up but you can't change the fundamental tone of the bass. You can adjust it a bit with the amp's tone controls, but the bass's tone will still come through. So if you are happy with how it sounds, then I wouldn't worry too much.

    I'd also suggest that string-through is more likely to affect the sustain and tone than the primary output volume.

  9. #17
    Mentor robin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,513
    @DarkMark,
    Yes mate, Tru-oil on the maple board. I am in the process of refurbing another guitar and noticed that when cleaning a very dirty fretboard that to remove all the gunk I also removed some of the TO meaning I had to redo the whole fretboard. Not a big deal but a lesson to clean the board periodically. Something that I am not familiar with

    @Simon
    Strings! of course. I don't know why I didn't think of it! It still has the crappy strings on that come with the kit. (Sorry Adam no offense meant). I will start saving for a set of D'addarios. I think I will still get some CTS pots as well.

    Thanks Simon, your insight is most helpful and appreciated as usual.

    Cheers guys
    rob

  10. #18
    Mentor dozymuppet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    842
    That's such a beautiful piece of wood. What a score.

    Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk

  11. #19
    Mentor robin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,513
    @Colin
    Thanks mate, I couldn't ask for higher praise than that.

    @Dozy
    Yes mate I agree, of all my kits this has to be the best body yet. It's always a bit of a pig in a poke when you order kits, this time I just got lucky.

    Cheers guys
    rob

  12. #20
    GAStronomist Simon Barden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    10,547
    Yes, the basic kit strings are known to be very poor, with low output and an uneven response from string to string. The kits would be better without them IMO, but then they wouldn’t be ‘complete’ kits.

    Might be worth trying out a set of Artist Guitar strings (mentioned in another current thread for guitar strings) as they are considerably cheaper than D’Addarios but seem to be on a par for quality and feel. I can get a set in the UK for £6 including postage compared to £20 and upwards for basic Rotosounds. Looks like they are AU$15 including postage for you. Worth a try? If you can cope with the kit strings, then the Artists should be a definite upgrade.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •