Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 113

Thread: Hetfield Uncle Milty (Iron Cross) Les Paul Custom Replica

  1. #11
    GAStronomist Simon Barden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    10,547
    I've used it on maple necks. One coat of a light amber tint is probably enough to give it a subtle aged look. Two for a more obviously aged look. Any more and it then becomes more of a colour in its own right. Some lacquer suppliers do both a light and a dark amber tint. I've only used the light stuff, though the dark stuff might give a more smoke-impregnated look to it. Spray it on first then cover it with protective clear coats (otherwise it's liable to wear off). I'd go with subtle, as it's very easy to overdo the effect in isolation. Keep a copy of the picture with you as a guide. Too little tint will look better than too much.

  2. #12
    Member CascadiaGuitarGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    239
    Subtle will definitely be better for this build. Even the ESP version I posted looks like they overdid the tint in my opinion.

  3. #13
    GAStronomist Simon Barden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    10,547
    Possibly. I've seen a couple of mid-'70s LP Customs with that level of yellowing. It can all depend on the level of exposure to both UV and tobacco smoke.

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by CascadiaGuitarGeek View Post
    When the kit arrived I gave it a once over and noticed a few issues. Luckily they weren't going to affect the finished product. The flame maple veneer had the joint line skewed and off center, but I'll have a solid black finish so no big deal there. The binding work was rough around the cutaway. This was easily scraped down though.

    Attachment 19042 Attachment 19043 Attachment 19044

    The shape and binding on the headstock looks pretty good. I straightened the neck and checked the frets, which were pretty level. That was a relief since my last LP kit took a whole lot of work to get playable, and even still has to have high action.

    Attachment 19045
    his is a custom isnt it with binding on top and bottom of the body is that a pit bull kit ? who did the binding on the head-stock and the Gibson shape

  5. #15
    Member CascadiaGuitarGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    239
    Quote Originally Posted by phrozin View Post
    his is a custom isnt it with binding on top and bottom of the body is that a pit bull kit ? who did the binding on the head-stock and the Gibson shape
    It isn't a Pitbull kit. It was from Guitar Kit World before the last redesign of their site. In addition to their custom kit orders, they had a few in stock kits including a Les Paul Custom copy and a Ken Lawrence-ish explorer (that I wish I would have ordered too). My kit does have the 7 ply WBWBWBW binding on the top and bottom of the body, and came with the 5 ply headstock binding and headstock shaping already done. I wouldn't be surprised if they got a warning about doing that.

  6. #16
    Member zeromick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    South Coast NSW
    Posts
    421
    Quote Originally Posted by CascadiaGuitarGeek View Post

    So before EMG started releasing their pickups with metal covers, James had a set of EMG 81/60s modified to look like vintage gold PAF humbuckers. This isn't as easy as it seems, since the EMGs have an epoxied on plastic cover that is larger than the inside dimensions of a standard humbucker cover. The solution I've seen on other forums is to sand/grind back the stock covers to fit inside the humbucker covers. Then cut the heads off some pole piece screws and epoxy them into the holes in the new cover. We'll see if I can do this without wrecking the whole lot.
    Hey mate, have you considered painting the EMG covers in the same way you're doing the iron cross?
    some gold and clear should get you pretty close.

  7. #17
    Member CascadiaGuitarGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    239
    Quote Originally Posted by zeromick View Post
    Hey mate, have you considered painting the EMG covers in the same way you're doing the iron cross?
    some gold and clear should get you pretty close.
    I did give that some thought, as well as just going with a gold EMG Het Set. But I wanted this to be as close to the original as possible, without starting with an actual Les Paul.

  8. #18
    Member CascadiaGuitarGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    239
    Nice weather and a bit of free time has come upon me so it's time for some more painting. Next steps will be decals and tinted poly.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20170516_191111.jpg 
Views:	257 
Size:	220.3 KB 
ID:	19386 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20170516_191118.jpg 
Views:	202 
Size:	164.4 KB 
ID:	19387
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20170516_191129.jpg 
Views:	231 
Size:	224.0 KB 
ID:	19388 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20170516_192137.jpg 
Views:	242 
Size:	227.4 KB 
ID:	19389

  9. #19
    GAStronomist wokkaboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    13,555
    looks good Cascadia, how wide is the binding on the top ? The masking is quite wide around the bottom edge
    Current Builds and status
    scratch end grain pine tele - first clear coat on !
    JBA-4 - assembled - final tweaks
    Telemonster double scale tele - finish tobacco burst on body and sand neck

    Completed builds
    scratch oak.rose gum Jazzmaster - assembled needs setup
    MK-2 Mosrite - assembled - play in
    Ash tele with Baritone neck - neck pup wiring tweaks and play in

  10. #20
    Member CascadiaGuitarGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    239
    Quote Originally Posted by wokkaboy View Post
    looks good Cascadia, how wide is the binding on the top ? The masking is quite wide around the bottom edge
    It's roughly 5.27 mm. Some of that edge might be the actual binding itself. When I masked I tried to keep it back from the edge a little so I'll have a bit to scrape off.

Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •