Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Epoxy as clear coat finish over stain?

  1. #21
    The downside to suction brushes is you need to run higher pressure than a gravity fed brush. Professionally you find that in general, airbrush artists working of hard surfaces use mainly gravity fed brushes, and those working on fabric or canvas mostly gravity fed. The Airbrush artist Mike Lavalee had Iwata make him a 0.3mm brush with a larger cup for less refills doing large surfaces for his true fire. If you are also planning to use an airbrush on your boards and you are selling them, do not get a cheap brush... once you have felt the performance difference of something like an iwata or richpen, you won't want to go back.

  2. #22
    Mentor JimC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    SE England
    Posts
    517
    I'm something of an epoxy fan, used it a lot for boat building. Not much for my amateur level luthiery though.

    There are ultra thin paint on epoxies, and I've used one to stabilise lower quality engineered rosewood fingerboards.

    Whilst UV resistance is a huge concern for coatings that live out in the sun, I don't think I'd be particularly worried about guitars that normally live indoors and in cases/bags.

    For whatever my opinion is worth though I don't think I'm very enthusiastic about epoxy as a body finish material: I'm a great believer that you should play to a material's strengths, and really decorative clear coating isn't an epoxy strength, unless you're using it to cover an underlying epoxy laminate. So if its a carbon fibre body fine, but I reckon there are better alternatives for wood. I suppose stabilising a really spectacularly unstable spalted or burled finish might be one possibility, but really that's playing to the strength of low shrinkage gap filling adhesive properties.

    Jim C
    Build #1, failed solid body 6 string using neck from a scrapped acoustic (45+ odd years ago as a teenager!)
    Build #2, ugly parlour semi with scratch built body and ex Peavey neck
    Build #3, Appalachian Dulcimer from EMS kit
    Build #4, pre-owned PB ESB-4
    Build #5, Lockdown Mandolin
    Build #6, Sixty six body for Squier
    Build #7, Mini Midi Bass

  3. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Sunshine coast
    Posts
    301
    Quote Originally Posted by JimC View Post
    I'm something of an epoxy fan, used it a lot for boat building. Not much for my amateur level luthiery though.

    There are ultra thin paint on epoxies, and I've used one to stabilise lower quality engineered rosewood fingerboards.

    Whilst UV resistance is a huge concern for coatings that live out in the sun, I don't think I'd be particularly worried about guitars that normally live indoors and in cases/bags.

    For whatever my opinion is worth though I don't think I'm very enthusiastic about epoxy as a body finish material: I'm a great believer that you should play to a material's strengths, and really decorative clear coating isn't an epoxy strength, unless you're using it to cover an underlying epoxy laminate. So if its a carbon fibre body fine, but I reckon there are better alternatives for wood. I suppose stabilising a really spectacularly unstable spalted or burled finish might be one possibility, but really that's playing to the strength of low shrinkage gap filling adhesive properties.

    Jim C
    Thanks Jim, I think you worded it perfectly. After going over all the comments and actually working with epoxy today I realised this too.
    There is a lot that can go wrong with epoxy as a top coat and though it is all fixable, I would end up using epoxy just because I already have it and know how to work it. A pretty weak argument if you ask me, also there are far easier products to work with.

    So I'm going to do a bit more reading into poly as I think this has the highest chance of a durable finish that doesn't discolour the underlying colours.

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by RocknRolf View Post
    So I'm going to do a bit more reading into poly as I think this has the highest chance of a durable finish that doesn't discolour the underlying colours.
    Hehe just make sure it's poly urethane and not poly ester!

  5. #25
    GAStronomist Simon Barden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    10,547
    Though Fender have used a clear polyester coat over the body as first sealing coat since 1963 (except for all-nitro pre-63 reproductions, custom jobs and some special editions). Clear, and goes over any initial staining applied. UV cured, it sets hard in 15 minutes and is paintable within an hour. It stops any finishes from sinking into the wood and saved them hours in paint and prep work. They've then put nitro or polyurethane or even more polyester over the top of that.

  6. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Sunshine coast
    Posts
    301
    Quote Originally Posted by Rabbit View Post
    Hehe just make sure it's poly urethane and not poly ester!
    Just when you think you have said something funny or outrageous, Simon is on standby to normalise- and flavour it with some history haha

  7. #27
    GAStronomist Simon Barden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    10,547
    I must admit that I can't but think of thick hard plastic vibration-dulling finishes when I hear the name polyester (as well as some really nasty shirts in the 70s).

  8. #28
    Overlord of Music McCreed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    AUS
    Posts
    3,552
    Polyester finish is used more widely than you might think, and TTBOMK, polyester is more or less a variant of polyurethane.

    It's also worth pointing out that the "poly" that we DIY'ers are buying at the hardware store is very different to what the guitar factories are applying.
    Last edited by McCreed; 23-01-2022 at 08:04 PM.
    Making the world a better place; one guitar at a time...

  9. #29
    Mentor JimC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    SE England
    Posts
    517
    Quote Originally Posted by McCreed View Post
    TTBOMK, polyester is more or less variant of polyurethane.
    I think you have to me using a *very* wide definition of the word variant for that to be true, they really are rather different, although I suppose there's an argument that one thin coat of polymerised plastic can't be utterly different from another.
    Build #1, failed solid body 6 string using neck from a scrapped acoustic (45+ odd years ago as a teenager!)
    Build #2, ugly parlour semi with scratch built body and ex Peavey neck
    Build #3, Appalachian Dulcimer from EMS kit
    Build #4, pre-owned PB ESB-4
    Build #5, Lockdown Mandolin
    Build #6, Sixty six body for Squier
    Build #7, Mini Midi Bass

  10. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    Gold Coast, Qld
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by McCreed View Post
    @Rodc - Like anything, you can spend as little or as much as you want. There are mini compressors and airbrushes that cost more than my big compressor and guns, but for a starting reference this compressor ticks a lot of boxes:

    Artlogic AC1418

    As for airbrushes, that's harder to specify because there are a number of different types, and depend on personal preference.
    Such as single or dual action, gravity or suction and nozzle size (some brushes accept various size needles & nozzles, other just one).
    You can a cheap $40 off-brand* one from eBay (like me ) or you can get a $400 Iwata.

    My brush is a dual-action with .2/.3/.5mm needles & nozzles, and will do both gravity and suction feed. I have only ever used the .5 nozzle since I have only used it for applying poly.
    As far as I can tell, mine is a knock-off of a Sparmax. The biggest issue I've found with the no-name one is spare parts like O-rings, but performance-wise, it's worked great.
    I have bought generic O-ring kits that provided the ones I needed, but also gave me ones that don't fit my brush so are of no use. If I had a genuine Sparmax or Iwata I could get full O-ring kits that would purpose fitted.

    FWIW the reason I cheaped out on the $40 one was I knew nothing about airbrushing and wasn't sure what results I would get so I minimised my outlay in case it was crap! I would spend more knowing what I know now but I haven't upgraded the airbrush because I bought a mini touch-up gun instead.

    *I just checked, and mine branded "Voilamart"
    Thank you again for the great info McCreed!

  11. Liked by: McCreed

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •