You'd normally put the curve of the bottom of the pickup rings, rather than trying to create a flat area for them to sit on. use some double sided tape to stick some sandpaper to the top of the guitar next to the pickup rout location, and move the ring back and forth on that so the bottom takes on the exact curve of the top. It takes a while but it does a good job in the end.
Most pickup routs for humbuckers have deeper recesses at the end to accommodate the pickup legs and adjustment screws. Some humbuckers have very shallow legs and they aren't needed, but most are reasonably deep (some are very deep), so I'd check to see if you need to rout out a bit of the cavity base for them. Even if your current pickups fit, if you change them in the future, you may need the extra depth at the ends, so it might be best to do it now.
The typical Gibson humbucker rout is 5/8" deep (15.9mm), with 1" deep end pockets (25.4mm), which should accommodate the deepest pickup legs you are ever likely to get.
Cheers simon, thanks for the input, i did originally plan to form the pickup rings to fit the contour of the guitar but due to the heavy angle on the carved top i decided that flattening the mounting area was far less work in this case
Good deal on the pickup cavity, i will investigate the clearance in the pockets
Ill add some pictures of pickuprings in progress
https://www.emgpickups.com/pi2.html
The EMG phase switch is active and expensive. For something you’ll rarely use, I personally wouldn’t bother. Because of the active nature of the pickups, I don’t believe you can install a simple passive switch or you’ll short out the battery or something similar.
With a bit more thought, I don't think you'd actually short out the battery, but you'd end up connecting the hot of one pickup to the battery ground of another, so you'd very likely get silence with both pickups on and the polarity swapped. Which is why it has to be done with an electronic circuit that isolates the signals, allowing them to be reversed.
Thanks mate, so really not worth the effort
Unless you are in a Peter Green/Fleetwood Mac covers band, it probably isn't. It's nice to have the option if it's already there, but the number of times you can really use it is very limited. Because it's so thin sounding, it gets lost in a mix very easily, so you need a pretty sparse backing to let it be heard. It really needs to be played clean, as you get a very weak drive sound from it.
Testfitting all the hardware before i go ahead and make the finishing touches!
The wiring
https://ibb.co/YXZqwdc
https://ibb.co/PwY32MZ
Body, neck and headstock
I ended up with a neck thickness of 25mm the entire lenght, i carved out a lot of curves in the body aswell as a stomach cutout and a strong relief where the neck meets the body, concerning frets i think i prefer as wide as possible so i barely filed the fret ends, i only rounded them off the slightest
NOTE this is UNFINISHED hence the blemishes
Last edited by Manisk; 23-10-2021 at 07:28 AM.
Difficult to intonate any tips? i was thinking of just bending a flat piece of metal in two different angles to be able to turn the screw
Im quite happy with the zero-fret, how much easier it is to tune compared to my previous build!
I was also quite lucky getting quite a low string action without any string buzz really, might lower the action even more or should i wait for the neck to settle after tuning, in that case how long?
I also have this 5-way switch that i am curious to know if i can implement into the current schematics as an on/off for the battery and perhaps utilize the remaining 4 circuits in some way
Please go ahead and inform me with anything you think i could benefit from! thanks
Last edited by Manisk; 23-10-2021 at 07:17 AM.