Attachment 11729
How about a Gibson Moderne? The templates are available. I just don't have the skills to do a neck and without the gumby headstock it's not the same.
Attachment 11730
Printable View
Attachment 11729
How about a Gibson Moderne? The templates are available. I just don't have the skills to do a neck and without the gumby headstock it's not the same.
Attachment 11730
no love for the orphan :(
doesn't look like it Dedman, pretty sure that axe featured in the ugly guitar thread
I love all the oddities. Sweptwings, Vox Phantoms and teardrops etc. Flying V is next on my hit list in fact.
the first 3 you mentioned I'm sure have all been in the ugly thread but I agree the Flying V is rock n roll !
We do need a new Cricket bat in the lineup..... :)
Hi Dedman, Sorry to say not a fan of v shape guitars. It's all good we love different things.But I see now why some guitarists call there guitars axes's.if you like them You should still build one Dedman.
yea it would be boring if we all drove Toyota's and played Strats through MarshalsQuote:
Originally Posted by kimball492
Hmmmm, I am a fan of some of the futuristic Gibbo's but this is not one of them. Same goes for the reverse Explorer which is top of the ugliest in my opinion whilst the reverse V was just plain dumb.
Attachment 11939Attachment 11940Attachment 11941
Explains why the Moderne's are virtually extinct or museum artefacts however some of the more modern day V's do have the similar offset one long, one short rear tail setup and was never a fan of them either.
some folks just don't understand them
Attachment 11943
It only clicked with me a while ago, the Moderne is a V you can play sitting down!!! I kinda dig them, in an oddball fashion, but I would never want to own one.
Billy digs em
Attachment 11944
It's kind of hard to believe that the Explorer, Flying V and Moderne were all designed and originally released in the '50s (except the Moderne, which didn't make it off the drawing board until it was "re-released" in the '80s. And they all flopped as well, which is why Gibson brought a car designer in to make the Firebird to replace them.
thanks for the history lesson Fretty, I never knew that !
I always thought the raised section on the 'Birds had traces of Harley tank/instrument cluster design in it. Shame they didn't call Harley Earl in we would have had streamliners! or Virgil Extner for some serious fins LOL
Aim, fire!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dedman
Sent from my GT-I9506 using Tapatalk
haha that's it Ponch, just needs to breath fire out the headstock like this baby
imagine playing a flying V like that your strumming arm would be sore after 30 seconds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2seXZcx-0W8
EDIT for some reason the insert video link has gone so I can't add the YT link with a picture
i want one!Quote:
Originally Posted by wokkaboy
what a flame throwing guitar Franken ? maybe you can incorporate into your next build and be able to light a bonfire at the same time hahah
Why not ask for the ridiculous.
The Gibson Thunderbolt.
Attachment 11957
It was actually a guitar that a UK guitar magazine had made up as a April fools story in the 90's, I think Kramer made a few after some people asked about it.
Build it and they will come LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Tweaky
In all seriousness I do like the Moderne, as a piece of Mid Century Modern design it ticks all the boxes. If they'd given it the right paint and pick guards it would have sold I think, lets face it the Fender jag looks like a counter top spill in outline, but it was presented the right way with colours and such that people liked. When they bought back the V and Explorer they had more options and they sold.
Attachment 11958
Attachment 11959
hey Dedman, I think the more I look at the Moderne shape the more it grows on me
Problem with the design is it's neck heavy, even when seated.
I remember trying a 2nd hand one years ago.
The Ronnie Wood designed Gibson S1 was a crap design as well, neither one thing or the other.
Attachment 11960
I admit the Graveyard Disciple is neck heavy when standing.
It's not the most terrible thing I've seen but that headstock though...
Agree with Fuzzbeard about the headstock being the worst attribute as that Green one with the black looks almost OK.
Hmmm, I have one, and it doesn't neck dive.... I'd like to build a fiver bass with that shape, and use the explorer head stock.
The gumby headstock gives tuning issues when the rollers get sticky.
Some pictures would be nice to see as never seen one up close and personal in this far flung part of the planet.Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralKaos
Hey General, just had an idea.....grab another EX-5 kit and use your Moderne as a patern to draw an outline to cut down the Explorer. You already have both and at a glance it looks like there would be enough meat in the EX shape in all the right places to make it work.Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralKaos
When I built the EX-5 & EX-1 both bodies were exact same measurements except for neck pockets due to one being a 6 string guitar set neck & the other a bolt on 5 stringer bass neck.
That thought has crossed my mind, Waz. I have one of the Epi set neck models that I upgraded with a JB and a pearly gates pick up set. sounds pretty good....
Hmmm, tasty indeed.